By Jack
Witek
![]() |
| Image credit: Collider.com |
It was
the worst of times and the best of times for the opening of the final film in
the magisterial Dark Knight trilogy, a film inspired by A Tale of Two Cities.
What had inspired James Holmes to murder? Culture Wars commentary points the finger at the
films themselves and the nihilistic ‘culture of death’ as Alex Jones calls it,
or it blames the 2nd Amendment. Was Holmes a patsy set up or only partly
involved, as the alternative research community is arguing? Is the fact that he
seems drugged out of his mind in court proceedings an indicator of anything? Or
that he was once a star neuroscience student at a university complex once owned
by the Army, and a hundred other oddities springing up like mushrooms?
At the
beginning of Chapter Three in A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens observes:
‘A Wonderful fact to reflect upon, that every human
creature is constituted to be that profound secret and mystery to every other.
A solemn consideration, when I enter a great city by night, that every one of
those darkly clustered houses encloses its own secret; that every room in every
one of them encloses its own secret; that every beating heart in the hundreds
of thousands of breasts there, is, in some of its imaginings, a secret to the
heart nearest it! Something of the awfulness, even of Death itself, is
referable to this. No more can I turn the leaves of this dear book that I
loved, and vainly hope in time to read it all. No more can I look into the
depths of this unfathomable water, wherein, as momentary lights glanced into
it, I have had glimpses of buried treasure and other things submerged. It was
appointed that the book should shut with a spring, for ever and for ever, when
I had read but a page. It was appointed that the water should be locked in an
eternal frost, when the light was playing on its surface, and I stood in
ignorance on the shore. My friend is dead, my neighbour is dead, my love, the
darling of my soul, is dead; it is the inexorable consolidation and
perpetuation of the secret that was always in that individuality, and which I
shall carry in mine to my life's end. In any of the burial-places of this city
through which I pass, is there a sleeper more inscrutable than its busy
inhabitants are, in their innermost personality, to me, or than I am to them?’
Commenting
for heraldonline James Carroll writes:
‘Apocalyptic fantasies have been a staple of
creative expression at least since the Book of Revelation, which, in the West,
defines much of the language of the genre: salvation through destruction,
cities under attack, angels versus devils, the end of history, and so on. ”The
Dark Knight Rises,” with a plot hanging on the detonation of a nuclear bomb,
efficiently follows the ancient form, with a 21st Century resonance. We bring
our real-life anxieties into darkened theaters, so why shouldn't movies pluck
dissonant chords tied, consciously or not, to nuclear dread or 9/11? Perhaps
bringing such doomsday anxieties into movie houses is a way of not unleashing
them on the world.’
Carroll
goes on to conclude:
‘It seems clear that, across the globe today,
barriers to inhuman behavior that was once unthinkable have been weakened. Mass
shootings are a sign of this — children expressly targeted in Norway last year.
So is the plague of suicide bombing that has befallen the Middle East, the self
turned into an indiscriminate weapon. Innocents not seduced but destroyed.
Blurred distinctions between fantasy and reality, between watching and doing,
between war and detached manipulation of technology: These are marks of a
precious psychological barrier being lowered. A dark night falling.’
I will be
addressing this awful, insulting and borish criticism in more depth at the end
of this article, but before I get even further ahead of myself, a word about
UFOs and classified energy and propulsion technologies, as after all is this
not the cult website Silver
Screen Saucers I am very happy to be guest blogging
for? To wit, Bruce Wayne, Wayne Enterprises and the Batman embody much of the
contradictions, power dynamics and symbolism inherent in the image of the UFO
cover-up that we in ufology have formed over the decades. In A.D. After
Disclosure, Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel push the edges in making a map of the
world with conspiracy drawn in and Disclosure played out, and in blogging on
the official website in an article titled Breakaway Civilisation, Richard
notes:
![]() |
| The Dynamic Duo: Zabel and Dolan. |
Such a group would continue to be funded secretly
and covertly by a combination of public and private funds. In effect, it would
constitute an invisible empire, with technology superior to the rest of the
world, able to explore areas of our world unavailable to the rest of us. It
would probably have a significant built infrastructure, possibly underground
and “off the grid” in important ways. It might even have interactions or
encounters with non-human intelligences behind the UFO phenomenon. Most
certainly it would be concerned somehow with managing the problem of “others”
here on Planet Earth. All of the above would indicate that the group members
would have deeper scientific and cosmological insights.
Yes, this might qualify them as a separate,
“breakaway,” civilization.
Such a group would have great independence from the
established system of power and control, although I would doubt its members
would live in a completely separate environment all the time, like some
Alternative 3 scenario. Most likely they would need to work in “our” world, if
for no other reason than that Earth is where the action is. They would probably
move back and forth between the realities of their deeply classified world and
the official reality that the rest of us inhabit. Undoubtedly not an easy
life.’
Not for
Bruce Wayne, not for them, one can hypothetically imagine. As an ironic wink,
in The
Dark Knight the police have a photo of Batman tacked to their ‘Most
Wanted’ board, next to a still from the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film, and I’m
sure John Keel, author of the Mothman Prophecies would have got a kick out of
Batman and his glowing red eyes swooping over the hallucinogen induced terrors
in Gotham in the first film. But Christopher Nolan, his co-writer brother, and
his producer wife, set out to strip the pomp and cartoon from the franchise,
like the effects of the Scarecrow’s psychotropic weaponized hallucinogen from
Batman Begins, as with ayahuasca which the blue flower compound is
reminiscent of, they purged the franchise, reflecting back some of society’s
basest elements, most terrible shadows and most transcendent hopes and fear.
In A.D.
After Disclosure, Richard and Bryce postulate that what began with the likes of
a Majestic 12 within the military as it was then, has since become a private
esoteric and corporate affair, the conspiracy of silence, which translates to
the League of Shadows and, of course, Batman himself. The interface of old and
new money, basically. Directly analogous to the question of classified ‘free
energy’ technology and the implications for Disclosure and the UFO, the plot of
the third film revolves around the clean energy fusion reactor that Wayne
developed and Bane turned into a bomb, the bomb module itself being evidently
directly designed to conform to the dimensions of the Trinity test site nuclear
device, known as the Gadget. Richard and Bryce argue in After Disclosure that
one of the main factors in the policy of UFO cover-up is the possibility of
reverse-engineering recovered craft and working out the energy systems that
drive them. This presumes of course there are any nuts and bolts systems
driving these or that it was an alien disc that crashed in Roswell or anywhere
else, and not something entirely different, even if it was ‘nuts and bolts’ as Joseph P. Farrell will attest. Of course it needn’t
even be that they directly reconfigured alien technology, they could simply
have been inspired by it to figure it out for themselves. Nick Pope has said as
much himself, while also flatly denying the possibility of recovered craft. In
an article
by Lee
Spiegel on the Calvine UFO photo that the MoD had secreted away: ‘Naturally, we
wanted the propulsion system,’ he added. ‘And if we couldn't get it, we wanted
to at least try and understand the principles on which it might work because
that might play into research and development.’ Christian Lambright makes an
interesting case for the US military being inspired by alien technology in his
book X Descending, which also chronicles the
psychological operation known now as the Bennewtiz Affair. Were they hiding Bat
crafts of their own at the Manzano weapons storage facility? Richard and Bryce
argue that the fear of the weaponization of such ‘free energy’ technology, or
the fear of starting a new arms race after you yourself have weaponized it and
losing your monopoly of power, could well be the crux of the secrecy.
Ufology
began pragmatically, more or less. The pool had yet to be unalterably muddied
by the contactees, by channels, by abduction, crop circles and mutes, by the
Bennewitz Affair or Exopolitics. This early groundedness was not least of all
owed to the fact that the first ufologists were from military and intelligence
backgrounds themselves, even chairpersons of whole civilian UFO groups. One of
the earliest and to this day staunchest rational advocates of the subject,
Jacques Vallee, pointed out in Messengers of Deception, as his military
intelligence source ‘Major Murphy’ warned him, that in some cases this was no
doubt not accidental. Like any good scientist, with some prodding, Vallee
collated his suspicions and paid attention to the uncomfortable details swept
aside in the rush to the utopic Disclosure and alien contact. He has never
swayed from his stance that the UFO is a physical object manifesting intense
energy of a physics known or unknown. Where he departed
at the
end of the ‘60s from almost everyone else was that he could never take it for
granted that in every case or even in most cases they were literal physical
aliens from an exoplanet. As Arthur Koestler said to him, hearing the accounts
of experiencers left him with the same feeling one has after a bad seedy joke.
Has the
UFO been used as a cover for groups on earth, military intelligence operations,
perhaps? Mind control experiments? This is again reminiscent of the blue flower
compound from Nolan’s Batman films that is used by the League of Shadows. Peter
Robbins notes that somewhere, there is a factory that makes the legless block
tables that are always encountered in regression accounts despite leading
questions, such as ‘describe how many legs the table has’. Well, perhaps. But
that in and of itself doesn’t account for the pathological, the goofy, the
downright absurd that is a lot of the abduction and contact accounts. In Batman
Begins, Ra's al Ghul counsels Bruce that: ‘If you make yourself more
than just a man, if you devote yourself to an ideal, and if they can't stop
you, then you become something else entirely.’ Which is? asks Bruce. ‘A legend,
Mr. Wayne’. And on his private jet, a conversation with Alfred: ‘People need
dramatic examples to shake them out of apathy and I can't do that as Bruce
Wayne, as a man I'm flesh and blood I can be ignored I can be destroyed but as
a symbol, as a symbol I can be incorruptible, I can be everlasting.’ What
symbol? asks Alfred. ‘Something elemental, something terrifying.’ Bane, in The Dark
Knight Rises: ‘Theatricality and deception, powerful agents for the
uninitiated. But we are initiated, aren't we Bruce?’
And that
word on violence and meme propagation, on the invidious accusations from Alex
Jones that these films are psychological conditioning. Alex Jones, a man who I
nonetheless respect greatly, has said on his radio show review that he walked
out halfway through the film in disgust at its acclimatising police state
propaganda. Apparently the film is nothing more than a giant corporate mind job
to vilify protesters, Occupiers, as terrorists and violent anarchists, that it
lionises the police and the militarised corporate security state in Wayne
Enterprises. Well, in brief, it appears evident Jones was not watching the same
film I was. I mean, of the police in the film, the ones on the bridge are
depicted essentially as fascists who were ‘just following orders’, the
Commissioner is disgraced as a liar, before atoning nearly with his life, a
young rookie tries to shoot Batman, and the other senior cop who refers to
Blake as an irresponsible ‘hothead’ and thus ensures Bane’s surprise siege, is
himself a careerist dolt who abuses his bloated force for celebrity. And Jones
says this film lionises the police?
![]() |
| Anne Hathaway as Selina Kyle (a.k.a. Catwoman) in The Dark Knight Rises (2012). |
It
bespeaks the tunnel vision that befalls great martyrs to causes, like Jones,
the very kind of martyr that is encountered in the trilogy on a grand scale. It
seems to deny the role of the artist, which is primarily to make art. Yes, it is
a giant Hollywood funded production with extensive corporate sponsorship, but
does that invalidate Christopher Nolan’s vision and the work of his family and
the creative geniuses he surrounds himself with? Corporations don’t care often
about the message, as long as they can make money off of it, co-opting it in
the process. But Nolan, I feel, is beyond that. Apparently Nolan and co are all
paid agents, or unwitting dupes, but what is this based on? The story arc of
this final film is perfectly continuous with what was began in 2005, so do we
then surmise that they foresaw Occupy and paid off Nolan years in advance? This
is pathetic and absurd. And after all, does Max Keiser not fill auditoriums and
TV studios to the full with people who cheer his message of
‘Let’s hang some bankers’? I’m not comparing the two, but Iran has just announced it will hang four defendants on charges of two
billion dollar banking fraud, perhaps as scapegoats for internal corruption.
Selina warns that: ‘There's a storm coming, Mr. Wayne. You and your friends
better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you're all gonna wonder
how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest
of us.’ Also, the argument that these films glory in violence is rather weak,
and reflects more on the mindset of the antagonists in the Culture Wars than it
does on these films, where all of the worst violence isn’t even shown in-frame.
Compare to Inglorious Basterds, or the Saw films. The true
violence explored in these films is psychological, spiritual. It is all about
the dark night of the soul. The comic book inspiration for these films also
lies heavily with Grant Morrison’s Arkham Asylum and Alan Moore’s Killing Joke.
I remember that David Fincher’s Fight Club gained the same criticism
from media commentators, that it encouraged anarchist violence, which always
completely ignored the fact that the films, like the Dark Knight trilogy, are a
meditation on violence, on movements, on secret societies, of how they become
the mirror of that which they are fighting. Interestingly enough, one of the
prisoners in Gotham’s Blackgate is seen reading Mein Kampf, with a big fat
swastika on the red cover. In Jon Ronson's Them: Adventures With Extremists,
the book that chronicles his infiltration with Jones into Bohemian Grove, of
his own separate adventures with the Bilderberg group, and other organisations
and ideological movements, he comes to the conclusion that while these secret
societies do exist, people like Jones – and here he does indeed unfairly and
unsparingly and untruthfully lump Jones in with the KKK and other groups –
however righteous they may be, are only the extreme mirror of the same groups.
I always felt this was an interesting if very overstated insight, but in some
ways I think it is indeed applicable, not that you won’t have already heard
this same criticism of course. But I am not here to bash Jones, simply to
criticise some of his statements. After all, like the ‘gang of psychopaths’
that Wayne refers to the League of Shadows as being, as Ronson found out in his
later adventure with The Psychopath Test: ‘This - Bob was saying - was the
straightforward solution to the greatest mystery of all: Why is the world so
unfair? Why all that savage economic injustice, those brutal wars, the everyday
corporate cruelty? The answer: psychopaths. That part of the brain that doesn't
function right. You're standing on an escalator and you watch the people going
past on the opposite escalator. If you could climb inside their brains, you
would see we aren't all the same. We aren't all good people just trying to do
good. Some of us are psychopaths. And psychopaths are to blame for this brutal,
misshapen society. They're the jagged rocks thrown into the still pond.’
![]() |
| Chalk it up to passion: director Christopher Nolan during the the filming of the critically acclaimed The Dark Knight Rises (2012). |
Jonathan Nolan said: 'A Tale of Two Cities' was,
to me, one of the most harrowing portraits of a relatable, recognizable
civilization that completely folded to pieces with the terrors in Paris in
France in that period. It's hard to imagine that things can go that badly
wrong.’ In The Dark Knight Rises,
you have the orphan child drawing with white chalk Batman wings onto walls,
which later John Blake adopts, as it were, and this symbolises the dual nature
of the beast, in contrast to Bruce Wayne’s blacked out lone wolf, er, bat.
Gotham’s version of the Canadian student movement’s Red Square, or Anonymous’ V
mask. What Steve Bassett calls the ‘Truth Embargo’ has been ongoing for
generations now, and trust in the state has not only been abused, it has been
used as a weapon, if Jacques Vallee and Dr. Joseph P. Farrell are right. People
are looking elsewhere for their truth now, even to irrationality and cults,
fleeing ‘from the light into the peace and safety of a new
dark age.’ But
certainly to the mythic.
Now, some people want to be swept
away by the UFO, but do they appreciate the shadow it casts into the past, into
our future, of the masks and the marks, and what they are really asking for? ‘It was the
best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the
age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of
incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was
the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us,
we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going
direct the other way— in short, the period was so far like the present period,
that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good
or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.’
Jack
Witek is the 'James Bond of Ufology', or so Richard Dolan insists, but you can
take it up with him. Jack is a full time dilettante in aforesaid, and generally
a reasonable chap. He Needs to Know, and feels you do to. He lives by the sea
in Plymouth, England, with his insufferable alien-hybrid cat, Adramelech, or
Adra for short. 'Adra, PUT that Man in Black down, NOW!' et cetera. You can
catch him in one of the city’s many fine drinking establishments sipping herbal
tea and nibbling quinoa crackers with his head buried in the latest UFO book,
trying to look inconspicuous yet mysterious and strangely attractive.
See more of Jack's work at his blog site, Unidentified Flying Media.
See more of Jack's work at his blog site, Unidentified Flying Media.







Bravo! A great use of the Dark Knight trilogy as an allegory for the UFO cover-up mythos.
ReplyDeleteTruly great Art is, like the UFO itself, nothing but a mirror reflecting back to us that which we seek to see.
Thank you, and yes, my sentiments exactly. You are more succinct than me though, haha. I had been wanting to write this article for about a year, but had to wait till the third film, but it did indeed tie in to my intuition about the trilogy and where they were going with it.
ReplyDeleteAs loath as I am to side with Alex Jones, I think the politics of The Dark Knight Rises are far more dubious than you suggest. Yes, the police are depicted as being flawed, but in the final analysis, it is only the police (depicted very heroically in the final struggle with Bane) and the benevolent billionaire who can save the people from the destructive potential of revolutionary social unrest. Think about how the actual citizenry of Gotham are depicted: the only ones we see in any detail at all are orphans (ie, hapless victims to be paternalistically shepherded by the kindly billionaire). During Bane's take-over of the city, we can only presume that they either participate in the looting, or remain as helpless bystanders. Despite its hypocritical suggestion that the symbol of Batman could be anyone, in the end, not one citizen is shown to exhibit any courage or initiative; they merely wait for Batman and the police to sort everything out. Although I'm not sure that the movie has a coherent political standpoint, one of its most striking moments is where Selena Kyle realizes that the "storm coming" was not what she imagined; her dream of wealth redistribution and social justice having turned into a nightmare of anarchy and mob rule.
ReplyDeleteIt is worth noting that David S. Goyer, one the RISES co-authors, also wrote the script for the video game Call of Duty 2, which ALSO features a villain who is an "idealized messiah of the 99%", utilizing poplar unrest for his own nefarious goals. It may be that Mr. Goyer suffers from a dearth of villain ideas, but this coincidence smacks of pro-establishment propaganda.
Well done Jack - well done young man! Outstanding!!
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree that, as the Nolan brothers have said, Bruce's only superpower is MONEY, I have to dissent on a number of your points, starting with the premise that these films ought to have been about progressive social upRISES, as it were. They are, of course, super hero films, in the grand tradition that Nolan himself has basically near single-handedly reinvented. In fact, I would say they are the closest thing to a genuine Wathmen adaptation outside of Snyder's Wathmen itself.But back to point, take Blake. You mention orphans, well, he is one. Yes, he goes on to be one of these controversial cops we are discussing. But in the end, he quits the force, and finds the Bat-cave, next to the new orphans home. Yes, alright, you could view that as one paternal figure passing the crown to his successor, but I don't see it that way. I see it as Blake taking Batman's words to heart, that just about anyone can do what Bruce did. Obviously, with a little help. But then again, if you are in a social-democratic nation and are collecting even some money from the government, aren't you yourself doing whatever you are doing with a "little bit of help?" As utterly loathe as I am to admit it, when Obama spewed out that stuff about how 'you didn't build that!', he had a point. So if anything, Libertarians should get a kick out of this film, right?
ReplyDeleteMoreover, there are acts of heroism in this film. You DO see the 'common people' rise up at the end to fight Bane's mercenary army. I can point out a number of scenes, but they are there. And in The Dark Knight, what do you have? You have Joker's sociology project on the river, involving the ferries. I think that has enough sociological commentary for the trilogy, even just that one sequence on the water.
Over to you! :-)
I'm gonna leave it at that, man, because I've been having this debate with a buddy of mine, and at this point, neither of us have changed our minds, and I'm getting tired of listening to my own shtick on this subject! I think I'm going to save my thunder for the next big super-hero movie political controversy - apparently Whedon has secretly hired Noam Chomsky and Slavoj Zizek to co-write AVENGERS 2, so there should be some fireworks going off then!
ReplyDeleteYou seem to be saying however, that there is no room in the world for super hero movies that aren't, well, propaganda...
ReplyDelete